Umland v. Holcombe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeals by the defendants from an order of the district court for Washington county, Crosby, J., presiding, appointing a receiver.
1Opinion of the CourtG-ileillan, C. J.
On judgments against the defendants, proceedings supplementary to execution were instituted against the defendant W. W. Holcombe. The disclosure showed that he owned a three-story brick building on a lot in the city of Stillwater. The second story was occupied by him as a residence for himself and his family; the first story was occupied by a tenant of his, who had no lease for any definite term; the third story he had leased in writing to a lodge of Odd Fellows, for a term of five years, ending July 1, 1881, with the further term of five years from that time, if desired by the lessee, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
3Cited by17 opinions
- Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Schwanz v. TeperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. Guckenheimer & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.