Legal Opinion
People v. Leal
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 2012No. A131366PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*833Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
This probation case presents recurring issues arising when a trial court considers imposing, consistent with the Lent test (People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, 486 [124 Cal.Rptr. 905, 541 P.2d 545]), a condition of probation restricting medical use of marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (CUA) (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5) and the Medical Marijuana Program (MMP) (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.7 et seq.).1 Daniel Lee Leal challenges such a condition imposed on him. Finding that imposition of the condition was not an abuse of discretion, we shall affirm the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Glasgow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
- In re A.R. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
- P. v. Radford CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.