Legal Opinion
Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Edison Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 5, 1982No. 81-2141PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, Senior District Judge:
Petitioners, Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California (Cities), seek review of two orders of Respondent, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), which Cities claim have effectively denied their right to compete for a license to develop the Balsam Meadow Hydroelectric Project (Project) in central California. Petitioners are municipalities which operate electric systems. Respondent is authorized, inter alia, to issue permits and licenses for the construction and operation of hydroelectric generating facilities under the Federal Power Act. Intervenor,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Northeast Occupational Exchange, Inc. v. Bureau of RehabilitationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- First National Bank of Chicago v. Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Texas Energy Reserve Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mayne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.