Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 19, 1999No. SC 16027PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

After a jury trial, the defendant, Freddie Cox, Jr., was convicted of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2).1 The defendant appealed his conviction, claiming that “(1) the state committed prosecutorial misconduct during the questioning of witnesses and during its closing argument, (2) the trial court made an improper statement to the jury thereby depriving the defendant of a fair trial and (3) the trial court improperly charged the jury, sua sponte, on consciousness of guilt, which allowed the jury to infer flight on an inadequate factual…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. BuonatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. CoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Brennan v. Burger King Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. State v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. State v. AbrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. HicksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. State v. BeallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API