Legal Opinion
State v. Hicks
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 18, 2000No. AC 17854PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*385 Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendant, Anthony Hicks, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 The defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On the evening of December 12, 1995, the Connecticut state police statewide narcotics task force coordinated apian with the Bristol police…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. TrotterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. DillardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.