Legal Opinion
Chisholm v. Foothill Capital Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 4, 1998No. 96 C 1174PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Terri Chisholm has filed a six-count second amended complaint against defendants, Foothill Capital Corporation (“Foothill Capital”), Norwest Corporation (“Norwest”), and Scott Diehl (“Diehl”) and Michael Sadilek (“Sadilek”), in their individual and official capacities, (collectively “defendants”). In Count I, plaintiff claims that Foothill Capital and Norwest discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. In Count II, plaintiff…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wynne v. Loyola University of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Haywood v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Helgeson v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1999
- McCaw Cellular Communications of Fla., Inc. v. KwiatekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Krane v. Capital One Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.