Legal Opinion
Haywood v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 1, 2001No. 00 C 4445PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALE SIA, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Lucent Technologies Inc.’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following rea sons, the court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Cherry Haywood (“Haywood”) brought this suit against Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). In Count I, Haywood alleges that Lucent retaliated against her for filing an EEOC claim in February 1999 and discriminated…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Bass v. Joliet Public School District No. 86Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Phillips v. Quality Terminal Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- DePinto v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Riley v. UOP LLC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.