Legal Opinion
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2007-0812PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
The Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin (the “Tribe” or “Menominee”) returns to this Court upon remand from the D.C. Circuit, continuing to seek monies from the Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service (“IHS”) for contract support costs the Tribe incurred in providing health care services to its members in 1995-2000. In reversing this Court, the Circuit found that the six-year limitation period for presenting administrative claims, as allowed by the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 401, et seq, can be equitably…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Menominee Indian Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Karl Langlois v. Bnsf Railway, CoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.