Legal Opinion

Estate of Monroe v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1997No. 20-30170PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

I. BACKGROUND

This case requires interpretation of § 2518(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and its accompanying regulations, which describe “qualified disclaimer” of benefits, a device commonly used for “post-mortem” estate and other tax planning. The diselaimants here were 29 legatees of the wife’s will, all of whom were asked by her husband and did irrevocably disclaim the proffered bequests. Shortly afterward, the husband gave them gifts equaling or exceeding the bequests, and not long after that he died at age 93. The Tax Court concluded that the disclaimers…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Tea Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Kanawha Gas & Utilities Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Ruth K. Dowell, Individually and as of the Estate of H. B. Dowell, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Pher Partners v. Womble (In Re Womble)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. In Re Estate of Denman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  5. Matter of Estate of MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API