Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Denman

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 27, 2008No. 04-07-00851-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by: STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.

This is an appeal from the probate court’s judgment construing section 2603(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and provisions in the will of Gilbert M. Den-man, Jr. (“the Will”) to determine the proper allocation of the federal generation-skipping transfer tax (“GST tax”). Appellants Leroy G. Denman, Jr., as independent coexecutor (“Denman”), and Wendel Denman Thuss, a beneficiary under the Will (“Thuss”), urged the tax should be charged and allocated to the residuary estate. Appellees The Trust Company, a coexecutor of the Will and co-trustee of a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Brown v. ToddTexas Supreme Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ESTATE OF Gilbert M. DENMAN Jr., Deceased, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  2. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. Bonser-LainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Jack Jones Hearing Centers, Inc. v. State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting & Dispensing of Hearing Instruments, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  4. Anna Maria Salinas Saenz v. Thorp Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  5. Jack Jones Hearing Centers, Inc. v. State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API