Legal Opinion

Minnesota Tea Co. v. Helvering

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1938No. 106PublishedCited by 286 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Petitioner, in 1928, brought about the organization of the Peterson Investment Company, and transferred to it certain assets in exchange for the entire capital stock of that company. The stock was immediately distributed to petitioner’s stockholders. Soon thereafter, petitioner transferred its remaining assets to Grand Union Company in exchange for 18,000 shares of that company’s stock and $426,842.52 in cash. The cash was immediately transferred to and divided among petitioner’s stockholders, in proportion to their stock holdings, in pursuance of a plan of reorganization. The Board of Tax…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

3Cited by286 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Benjamin D. And Madeline Prentice Gilbert v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Commissioner v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kenneth Allen Barbara Allen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API