Legal Opinion

House of Norvelle v. Queen Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1961No. 39167PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.

For the purpose of commencing this action, plaintiff in error filed its petition, as plaintiff, in August, 19S9, based upon a policy of insurance called a “Jewelers’ Block Policy”, issued to it in March, 1954, by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant. In material substance, the petition alleged a loss of diamonds in October, 1954, in the amount of $3,946.68, and that said loss was covered by and defendant was obligated to pay it under, the terms of said policy. To said petition was attached a photostatic copy of the policy, which contained,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re MosherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com. v. EddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Betthauser v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Charles C. McCarty and Cora L. McCarty v. First of Georgia Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Jade Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API