Legal Opinion
Howell v. Motorola, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 21, 2011No. 07-3837, 09-2796PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
The two cases that we have consolidated for decision in this opinion both deal with the responsibilities of a company with respect to a defined-contribution pension plan that it offers to its employees. The company in each instance is Motorola, Inc., and the disputes concern employees’ retirement accounts in the Motorola 401 (k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”). Bruce Howell was the original plaintiff when this litigation began in 2003; later, Stephen Lingis, Peter White, and Donald Smith intervened as plaintiffs. All were employees of Motorola who participated in the Plan. In…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Spano v. the Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Loomis v. Exelon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Raymond Pfeil v. State Street Bank and Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Tibble v. Edison InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Schumacher v. AK Steel Corp. Retirement Accumulation Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.