Johnson v. Mocabee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error to the District Court of Canadian Coimty, Hon. A. J. Seay, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
CLARK, J.
On the 20th day of March, 1891, the plaintiff in error, Johnson, commenced an action of replevin against the defendant, Mocabee, to recover the possession of seven horses and one mule. The defendant answered, setting up as a defense, that said live stock was destrained while trespassing and doing damage on his premises, and that he held the same for the purpose of securing the payment of damage done by said stock and the costs of the keeping of said stock and of appraising the damages.
To the answer, the plaintiff demurred on the ground that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stocking v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- State ex rel. Henderson v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- State ex rel. Johnson v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Enyart v. OrrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Blankenship v. DeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1906
- Hudgins v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Johnson v. Homestead-Iron Dyke Mines Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.