Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 11, 1991No. 147, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The petitioner, George Jones (Jones), challenges his enhanced sentence as a three time offender under the drug laws. He asserts that the State failed to prove a predicate for enhanced punishment, namely, that he had served at least 180 days of a term of confinement imposed as the sentence for one of the predicate convictions. Two issues are presented.

1. Did the trial court and the Court of Special Appeals err in concluding that the burden of going forward with the evidence shifted to Jones to prove that he had not served a minimum of 180 days when the State proved that Jones…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Temoney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Underhill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Dove v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Beverly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API