Legal Opinion

Deville v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 23, 2004No. 132 Sept. Term 2003PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*221RAKER, Judge.

In this case, we must decide whether home detention1 qualifies as “confinement in a correctional institution” under Maryland’s enhanced penalty statute directed at habitual criminal drug offenders. Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl. Vol., 2001 Supp.), Article 27, § 286(d)2 of the Controlled Dangerous Substances law, provides that a defendant who “has been convicted twice” of similar offenses under § 286(b)(1) or (b)(2) and has served a “term of confinement of at least 180 days in a correctional institution” is subject to a prison term of no less than twenty five years. We shall hold…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. BOARD OF ED. OF BALTIMORE CTY. v. Zimmer-RubertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API