Deville v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*221RAKER, Judge.
In this case, we must decide whether home detention1 qualifies as “confinement in a correctional institution” under Maryland’s enhanced penalty statute directed at habitual criminal drug offenders. Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl. Vol., 2001 Supp.), Article 27, § 286(d)2 of the Controlled Dangerous Substances law, provides that a defendant who “has been convicted twice” of similar offenses under § 286(b)(1) or (b)(2) and has served a “term of confinement of at least 180 days in a correctional institution” is subject to a prison term of no less than twenty five years. We shall hold…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- BOARD OF ED. OF BALTIMORE CTY. v. Zimmer-RubertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.