Beverly v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
In this case we are called upon to decide whether a trial court is bound to impose a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to a subsequent offender statute where the defendant is a subsequent offender but there is a plea agreement whereby the State agreed not to treat the conviction as a subsequent offense. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the decision to pursue a mandatory minimum sentence under a subsequent offender statute is a matter of prosecutorial discretion, and the court is, therefore, not bound to impose a mandatory sentence if the prosecution either does…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Oglesby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Dickey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Lathem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.