Legal Opinion
United States v. Murgas
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 12, 1998No. 95-CR-384 HGMPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The court now confronts defendants’ motions for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 29 and 33. On March 21, 1996, the Grand Jury charged the above captioned 13 defendants in an eight count second superseding indictment with engaging in a conspiracy to distribute large quantities of powder and crack cocaine in Rome, New York, and the surrounding Oneida County area. See Docket Document Number (“Dkt.No.”) 38.
Count I of the indictment charged defendant Raul Antonio…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Carluin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Evelyn SotoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Cordoba-MurgasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. MurgasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. EppolitoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Pueblo v. Vargas De JesúsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998
- United States v. MurgasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.