Legal Opinion
United States v. Murgas
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1998No. 5:95-cr-00384PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Raul Antonio Cordoba-Murgas (“Raul Cordoba”), Luis E. Cordoba-Murgas (“Luis Cordoba”) and Luis Todd-Murgas (“Luis Todd”) have motions before this court opposing the government from seeking an upward departure in their sentencings. 1 The government, which opposes defendants’ motions, seeks a sentencing enhancement for defendants based upon their alleged involvement in a double homicide. The government contends that on January 12, 1995, Luis Cordoba directed Raul Cordoba and Luis Todd to collect a drug debt from Jason Jacobs…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Cordoba-MurgasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Cordoba-MurgasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Cordoba-MurgasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MurgasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. Young Ji ChungDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.