Legal Opinion

Fordyce v. Modern Woodmen of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1924No. 18415PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered May 14, 1923, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a fraternal benefit certificate, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent’s complaint, dated June 23, 1922, alleges that appellant is a fraternal beneficiary society, incorporated under the laws of the state of Hlinois, and doing business in the state of Washington; that respondent is the same person as Rosena J. Olisby, named as beneficiary in benefit certificate No. 792,696, issued by appellant to Frank W. Clisby on. December 2, 1902, whereby appellant agreed that, in the event of Olisby’s death while a member in good standing of the society, it would pay to his beneficiary the sum of $3,000. Paragraph 8 of the complaint is as follows:

“That Frank W.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Steen v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Butler v. Supreme CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Samberg v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Stearns v. CopeIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Adler v. University Boat Mart, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Nitsche v. Security Benefit Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fernandez v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Harris v. Security Benefit AssociationWashington Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API