Legal Opinion

Andress v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1963No. Appeal, No. 340PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas which, without taking testimony, affirmed the decision of the Zoning Board to grant a variance for the erection of an apartment house.

Appellee, CMC Construction Company, a land development company (hereinafter called “C M C”) purchased the parcel of land here involved at the same time that it purchased three neighboring (but not contiguous) parcels in 1956. The lot in question is zoned “A” Residential. It has the shape of a trapezium.* Although its frontage on Yerree Road is 395 feet, its maximum…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Western Pennsylvania Socialist Workers 1982 Campaign v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API