Legal Opinion
Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 6, 1979No. 298PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*505OPINION
MANDERINO, Justice.
Appellants, Ronald Petrosky and Patricia Petrosky, husband and wife, obtained an option to purchase a parcel of ground from the husband’s father. The parcel under option was part of a larger parcel to which the husband’s father held legal title. After obtaining the option to purchase, appellants submitted a request to the Township of Upper Chichester for permission to erect a garage on the premises to be used for the housing of trucks. In requesting permission, appellants advised the Township that they had an option to purchase the premises. Zoning, building, and use…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Moyerman v. GlanzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Heidorn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Cornell Companies, Inc. v. Borough of New MorganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Marlowe v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Highland Park Community v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.