State ex rel. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gorman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A writ of mandamus may issue only where the relator shows (1) a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) a clear legal duty upon respondent to perform the act requested, and (3) that relator has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Butler, v. Demis (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 123, 124; State, ex rel. Akron Fire Fighters, v. Akron (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 448, 450.
Appellant contends that appellee is under a clear legal duty to apply the doctrine of forum non convmims. In Hughes v. Scaffide (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 85, we discussed the doctrine of forum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Hughes v. ScaffideOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Local 330 v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by24 opinions
- Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Kinsey v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Starner v. DehoffOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Barnett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. Johnson v. OSU Cancer Research Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.