Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Local 330 v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1978No. 77-1492PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

As set forth in State, ex rel. National City Bank, v. Bd. of Education (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 81, at page 84, before relators may obtain a writ of mandamus, they must show “ (1) that they have a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) that respondents are under a clear legal duty to perform the acts, and (3) that relators have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.”

The issue in this cause revolves around whether respondents have a clear legal duty to grant relators’ request for a 10.7 percent salary increase beginning on April 1, 1977.

Section 70a provides that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Cody v. TonerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Webb v. Board of Education of Bryan City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API