Legal Opinion

Leblanc v. Pierce Motor Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 12, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

Both actions are brought by the owner of a motor truck that was parked on Water Street in Fitchburg in the evening of February 6, 1938, to recover for damage done to the truck when it was struck by an automobile registered in the name of the corporate defendant and driven by one Metivier. These actions arise out of the same accident that was the subject of the decision in Theriault v. Pierce, ante, 532.

In each of the present cases the only exception is to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict for the defendant. The judge submitted the action against the corporate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Thomes v. Meyer Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Haun v. LeGrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mundy v. Pirie-Slaughter Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Leone v. DoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Pochi v. BrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Gaines v. RatnowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Fitiles v. UmlahMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API