Legal Opinion

Fitiles v. Umlah

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

On August 16, 1945, the plaintiffs Anna S. Fitiles, William V. Logue, Muriel Logue, Dorothy Logue, William V. Logue, Junior, and John Clark were riding in a motor vehicle owned by Elizabeth Eliopoulos, and operated by said Anna S. Fitiles, and were injured in a collision between that motor vehicle and another owned by the defendant William A. Umlah (hereinafter called the defendant) and operated by one Walter F. Kilgallon, Junior. Counts were added by William V. Logue to recover consequential damages for medical service rendered to his wife and minor children, and by Alfred Clark to recover…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Smith v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Dickinson v. Great American Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Ouellette v. Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Leblanc v. Pierce Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leone v. DoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Cheek v. Econo-Car Rental System of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Davis v. WalentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Sedlacek v. AhrensMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Arrigo v. LindquistMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API