Ross v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This proceeding in mandate involves the right of petitioner to become a member of the Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association. Specifically it requires a determination of the question whether an elective officer has a right to membership and subsequent retirement under the provisions of the retirement law and the Constitution. If this question is answered in the affirmative then the date of the county’s acceptance of a constitutional privilege plays a part in the legal rights of the petitioner. In brief, does the date of effectiveness or the date of operation of an ordinance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomas v. Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Wilson v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. HinojosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.