Legal Opinion
Condotti, Inc. v. Slifka
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
This is an application for a temporary injunction by the owner of four copyrighted textile designs (Exhibits “1”, “3”, “5” and “7”). The defendants sought to be so enjoined are'competitors of the plaintiff who are marketing similar textile designs (Exhibits “2”, “4”, “6” and “8”) claimed by plaintiff to be infringing plaintiff’s copyrighted designs. In addition, plaintiff claims that defendants have been committing acts of unfair competition.
Certain uneopyrighted fabric designs (Exhibits “9” and “11”) owned by plaintiff are also said to have been copied by defendants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Dixon Textile CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Millworth Converting Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Joseph Slifka and Sylvia Slifka, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Concord Fabrics, Inc. v. Generation Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Concord Fabrics, Inc. v. Marcus Brothers Textile Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Manes Fabrics Co. v. Miss Celebrity, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Loomskill, Inc. v. Stein & Fishman Fabrics Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971