Legal Opinion
Golenpaul v. Rosett
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1940PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
The originators and owners of the currently popular radio program entitled “ Information Please ” here seek to enjoin the defendants from using that combination of words as the title of a magazine. The defendants Rosett and Braverman have defaulted and apparently are content to be enjoined. Resistance comes only from the defendants Boressoff and Information Publications Corporation, which Boressoff owns and controls, and those two are hereinafter referred to and spoken of as the defendants.
Since May, 1938, the title “ Information Please ” has been used and is now being used to designate a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vais Arms, Inc. v. George VaisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- T & T Manufacturing Co. v. A. T. Cross Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
- American Photographic Pub. Co. v. Ziff-Davis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Kirkland v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.