Taylor v. Ballard
California Court of Appeal
Possession of easement as notice of title, note, 13 L. R. A’. (N. S.) 132. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The plaintiff, Henry W. Taylor, appeals from a judgment quieting his title to twenty-four and one-half acres of land in the Claremont district of Berkeley, subject to a right of way across it, adjudged to belong to the respondents, E. D. Walden and Virginia E. Walden.
The parties claim from a common source of title. E. E. Hewlett and lone Fore Hewlett, his wife, the common grantors, acquired title to twenty-seven acres of land, bounded on'the north and east sides by a deep canyon with, precipitous sides. Between the land and the nearest public roads on those sides intervened the lands of other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scheerer v. CuddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Beattie v. CrewdsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Randall v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- San Francisco & San Joaquin Valley Railway Co. v. LevistonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Webster v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hanchett v. WiseleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Zimmerman v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Amerco, Inc. v. TullarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960