Legal Opinion

San Francisco & San Joaquin Valley Railway Co. v. Leviston

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1901No. S.F. No. 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeals from judgment and final order of condemnation in suit to condemn defendant’s land.

The complaint was demurred to generally, and on the special grounds (among others) that it- is ambiguous, unintelligible, and uncertain in its allegations as to the location, general route, and termini of the plaintiff’s road, and, also, that it does not appear from its allegations that the use for which the property is required is a public use.

With regard to the latter point, the allegation of the complaint is, in effect, that the plaintiff was incorporated for the purpose of constructing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. California Southern Railroad v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. City of Los Angeles v. GagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. City of Grafton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Alper v. TormeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API