Legal Opinion
Monarch Brewing Co. v. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1942No. 10056PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an action for damages for alleged breach of warranty. For convenience we shall refer to the appellant as plaintiff and to the appellee as defendant. Jurisdiction of the District Court was based upon diversity of citizenship plus the requisite jurisdictional amount.
Before proceeding to a discussion of the allegations of the complaint upon which the Court granted the defendant summary judgment, we are faced with a question raised by the defendant as to whether or not the appeal herein was timely. It appears that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wright v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Jones v. Holland Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Martin v. Southern Engine & Pump Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Wallich Ice MacHine Co. v. HanewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re SlimickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Berwind Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- DP Service, Inc. v. AM InternationalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
- In Re Thurman Brown, Thurman Brown v. Wilshire Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.