Legal Opinion

Martin v. Southern Engine & Pump Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1939No. 10843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ GRAVES, Justice.

This appeal calls for a review of but a single portion of the trial court’s judgment, towit:

Through instructed verdict the appellee was awarded a $350.48 recovery against appellant, together with a foreclosure of its claimed lien on the machinery involved, as the determined balance due it from him on two written contracts between them, of dates March 7 and March 19, 1936, respectively, wherein the appellee had sold appellant by the March 7 contract two “Pre-Cooler Separators of Frick Design”, and by the one of March 19, a “Hercules Engine”.

That much of the judgment was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Harris County v. CharltonTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McKibbin v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. PevetoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Monarch Brewing Co. v. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. Hycel, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  4. J. K. Hughes Oil Co. v. Mayflower Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Clark v. Ferro CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API