Martin v. Southern Engine & Pump Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
■ GRAVES, Justice.
This appeal calls for a review of but a single portion of the trial court’s judgment, towit:
Through instructed verdict the appellee was awarded a $350.48 recovery against appellant, together with a foreclosure of its claimed lien on the machinery involved, as the determined balance due it from him on two written contracts between them, of dates March 7 and March 19, 1936, respectively, wherein the appellee had sold appellant by the March 7 contract two “Pre-Cooler Separators of Frick Design”, and by the one of March 19, a “Hercules Engine”.
That much of the judgment was not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Harris County v. CharltonTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- McKibbin v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. PevetoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Monarch Brewing Co. v. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Hycel, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
- J. K. Hughes Oil Co. v. Mayflower Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Clark v. Ferro CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.