Legal Opinion

Wallich Ice MacHine Co. v. Hanewald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1936No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 38,340PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

The issue presented by this appeal is the right of defendant and appellee to assert set-off or recoupment. Plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit and admittedly was entitled to recover at least $475 (the amount found by the jury) unless the amount otherwise due it was reduced by set-off or recoupment. On trial by jury plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $125. It has appealed and asserts that defendant was erroneously allowed his alleged counterclaim.

The litigation arises from the purchase of a refrigeration plant by defendant from the plaintiff corporation on March 7,1930. The price of $2,025…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz Showell Corp. v. BonfiglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Abram v. ArrighiniMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCoig Materials, LLC v. Galui Construction, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Kraft Foods North America, Inc. v. Banner Engineering & Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. Monarch Brewing Co. v. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Pipe Welding Supply Co. Inc. v. Gas Atmospheres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API