Wallich Ice MacHine Co. v. Hanewald
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.
The issue presented by this appeal is the right of defendant and appellee to assert set-off or recoupment. Plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit and admittedly was entitled to recover at least $475 (the amount found by the jury) unless the amount otherwise due it was reduced by set-off or recoupment. On trial by jury plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $125. It has appealed and asserts that defendant was erroneously allowed his alleged counterclaim.
The litigation arises from the purchase of a refrigeration plant by defendant from the plaintiff corporation on March 7,1930. The price of $2,025…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schwartz Showell Corp. v. BonfiglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Abram v. ArrighiniMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCoig Materials, LLC v. Galui Construction, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Kraft Foods North America, Inc. v. Banner Engineering & Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Monarch Brewing Co. v. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Pipe Welding Supply Co. Inc. v. Gas Atmospheres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.