Legal Opinion

State v. Whitling

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2018No. CA2016–10–202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendrickson, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Timothy Craig Whitling, appeals from his conviction and sentence in the Fairfield Municipal Court for violating a protection order. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse appellant's conviction and remand the matter for further proceedings.

I. FACTS

{¶ 2} On August 10, 2016, appellant was arrested and charged in Fairfield Municipal Court Case No. 2016CRB01987 with violating a protection order in contravention of Fairfield Codified Ordinances 537.15(a)(1), a misdemeanor of the first degree. The charge arose out of allegations that appellant violated a protection…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. BerryOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BockOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. McHargueOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. CullenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. PurdyOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API