Legal Opinion

State v. Bock

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1986No. 86-508PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

The court of appeals found that the trial court’s failure to hold a competency hearing pursuant to R.C. 2945.37(A) necessitated the remand of this action for a new trial. We disagree. The appellate court below also held that the trial court’s instruction to the members of the jury that they could disregard the factual determination of whether the twelve-year-old male victim was the defendant’s spouse because “in this case, it’s not appropriate” was harmless error. We agree.

R.C. 2945.37(A) provides in pertinent part:

“In a criminal action in a court of common pleas or municipal court, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. NutterOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BerryOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. AhmedOhio Supreme Court · 2004

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API