Legal Opinion

State v. Berry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 93-2592PublishedCited by 202 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellant presents a number of issues for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have carefully considered each of appellant’s propositions of law, independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the evidence presented in mitigation, and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold appellant’s death sentence.

I

R.C. 2929.05 requires this court to review capital cases in a certain manner. However, as we have held on a number of previous occasions, R.C. 2929.05 does not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. SlagleOhio Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by202 opinions

  1. State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. CowansOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API