Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 23, 1996No. 95-5207PublishedCited by 739 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

delivered the, opinion of the Court.

In Oklahoma the defendant in a criminal prosecution is presumed to be competent to stand trial unless he proves his incompetence by clear and convincing evidence. Okla. Stat., Tit. 22, § 1175.4(B) (1991). Under that standard a defendant may be put to trial even though it is more likely than not that he is incompetent. The question we address in this case is whether the application of that standard to petitioner violated his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

I

In 1989 petitioner was charged with the brutal killing of an 86-year-old man in…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by739 opinions

  1. Vijendra K. Singh v HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Miller v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

734 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API