Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The court’s opinion filed August 4, 2015, and appearing at 798 F.3d 749 (9th Cir. 2015), is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed herewith.
With this amended opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. That petition is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
AMENDED OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
When an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determines that a claimant for Social Security benefits is not malingering and has provided objective medical evidence of an underlying impairment which might reasonably…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,723 opinions
- Trevizo v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Kanika Revels v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Leopoldo Leon v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Karen Lambert v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Bernard Laborin v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
2,718 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.