Legal Opinion
Trevizo v. Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2017No. 15-16277PublishedCited by 2,471 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on July 10, 2017 is amended, and an amended opinion is filed. With these amendments, we deny Defendant-Appellee’s petition for panel rehearing. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
Vivian Trevizo (“Trevizo”), a 65-year-old woman last employed as a security guard nine years ago, in 2008, appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of disability benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Trevizo argues…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,471 opinions
- Leopoldo Leon v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Brian Glanden v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Leon v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- O'Connor v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Morris v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
2,466 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.