Legal Opinion
Zetterberg v. State Department of Public Health
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1974No. Civ. 43578PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
Plaintiffs alleging themselves to be taxpayers and citizens of the State of California instituted an action for declaratory relief regarding the effect of the Mulford-Carrell Air Resources Act (Health & Saf. Code, § 39000 et seq.) praying for “a declaration that the enactment of the so-called ‘Pure Air Laws’ of California in 1967 and subsequent years have not preempted to the Air Resources Board or any other official agency or board other than the Public Health defendants the control of smog and pollution resulting from motor vehicles, and further declaring that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Avila v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.