Legal Opinion
Vaill v. Edmonds
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1991No. B045402PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
The Commissioner of the California Department of Real Estate ordered the revocation of Dana Lenahan Vaill’s license to sell real estate on the grounds that she violated Business and Professions Code section 10177, subdivision (g) by failing to disclose to buyers of a residence the existence of a dangerous geological hazard on the property and the events occurring at a meeting called by the County of Los Angeles to discuss this hazard. At the time of the events at issue in this case, Business and Professions Code section 10177 stated in relevant part, “The commissioner *250may…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Anderson v. LatimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Petrucci v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- California Real Estate Loans, Inc. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Marek v. Board of Podiatric MedicineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Lam v. Bureau of Security & Investigative ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Welch v. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. SandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.