Legal Opinion

Marek v. Board of Podiatric Medicine

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1993No. B067385PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

The Board of Podiatric Medicine, Medical Board of California, Department of Consumer Affairs (the California Board) appeals from a judgment granting a writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) brought by Dr. Neal Allen Marek and Dr. Robert G. Basinger (petitioners). Petitioners had successfully challenged in the superior court the California Board’s disciplinary order, which had revoked the license of each doctor but stayed revocation and placed each on probation for a three-year period upon specified terms and conditions.

Petitioners had previously entered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Halyalkar v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Perrine v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Khan v. State Board of Auctioneer ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Medical Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Butts v. Wyoming State Board of ArchitectsWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API