Legal Opinion
United States v. Timothy S. Curry, Samuel T. Harding, Don J. Leinenbach, Robert Holland and Roger S. Curry
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 23, 1992No. 91-2550, 91-2556, 91-2578, 91-2579 and 91-2586PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
A jury found defendants Timothy Curry (“Tim”), Roger Curry (“Roger”), Don Jeffrey Leinenbach, and Samuel T. Harding guilty of conspiracy to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute in excess of fifty kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Tim, Roger, and Harding were also found guilty of manufacturing in excess of fifty kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The jury found defendant Robert Holland guilty of making false declarations before a federal grand jury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1628. The defendants raise a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- In the Matter of Robert Sheridan, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of City National Bank of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.