Legal Opinion

United States v. Frost

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1997No. Nos. 95-6004, 95-6005, 95-6006, 95-6011, 95-6012, 96-5722, 96-5725, 96-5726 and 96-5785PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

These five criminal defendants raise numerous issues attacking their convictions and sentences for committing mail fraud against the federal government and the University of Tennessee. One defendant also appeals his conviction for knowingly making a false material declaration before a grand jury. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. Introduction

During the time period at issue, defendant Dr. Walter Frost was a full-time professor and Chairman of the Department of Engineering…

2Cases cited163 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Leon CombsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API