Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. DeWitt
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ambler, J.). The following are the prayers offered hy the plaintiff and defendant, respectively, and the action of the trial Court upon each: Plaintiff First Prayer.- — The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury, that if they find from the evidence, that in the month of February, 1906, the plaintiff had entered into contracts with the Mallard Distilling Company to supply it with 2,000 gross of glass flasks at $2.40…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ambler, J.). The following are the prayers offered hy the plaintiff and defendant, respectively, and the action of the trial Court upon each: Plaintiff First Prayer.- — The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury, that if they find from the evidence, that in the month of February, 1906, the plaintiff had entered into contracts with the Mallard Distilling Company to supply it with 2,000 gross of glass flasks at $2.40 per gross, if they so find. And further find that the plaintiff was at all times able and ready to comply with said…
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The amended declaration upon which this case was tried alleged that since the year 1886 the plaintiff had been a dealer in imported and domestic bottles, demijohns, etc.; that the defendant, the Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Company, a foreign corporation, was engaged in the manufacture of glass bottles, window glass, etc., and conducted its factory at Bridgton, in the State of New Jersey; that it complied with the requirements of the laws of this State which permit foreign corporations to transact business here, and that it was in fact doing business here. It further alleged that on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Sumwalt Ice & Coal Co. v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Milske v. Steiner Mantel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.