Legal Opinion

Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. Glover

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1982No. 81-352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.

The plaintiff, Berkshire Mutual Insurance Co., brought a petition for a declaratory judgment, RSA 491:22, in the superior court seeking a ruling that, because of a failure to notify the division of motor vehicles that Philip Martin was not insured, the defendant Shelby Mutual Insurance Company (Shelby Mutual) was estopped to deny insurance coverage for Martin, the driver of an automobile involved in a July 14, 1977, accident. The Master {Roger G. Burlingame, Esq.) recommended that the plaintiffs petition be denied. The Superior Court {DiClerico, J.) approved the master’s recommendation. We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ComeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  2. Auclair v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GeerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Concord Group Insurance Companies v. Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. CarrierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sentry InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API