Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sentry Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This appeal arises out of cross motions for summary judgment filed by the parties. Upon the recommendation of a Master (Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esq.), who decided the case on agreed facts and briefs, the motion of the plaintiff, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. (Hartford), was denied by the Trial *162Court (Morrill, J.), and the motion of the defendant, Sentry Insurance Co. (Sentry), was granted by the Trial Court (Cann, J.). Hartford appeals.
Two questions are presented on appeal. The first question is whether, when an insurance company files an SR-22 form with the division of motor vehicles,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reserve Insurance v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. SweattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GeerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. GloverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982