Legal Opinion

Concord Group Insurance Companies v. Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1984No. 82-332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment, entered by the superior court, concerning insurance coverage for a vehicular accident. The issue presented is whether the defendant insurance company is estopped from denying coverage under its personal injury protection (PIP) policy because of its failure to comply with the notice requirements of RSA 268:5, IV (now codified at RSA 264:3, IV). For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the insurer under a PIP policy does not have a statutory obligation to notify the department of safety of its decision to deny coverage within fifteen days of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ComeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  2. Hein v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  3. Auclair v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GeerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  5. Bowlan Lumber Co. v. LemireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green Mountain Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Green Mountain Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API