Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. Choctaw Lbr. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1933No. 22973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

R. A. Fincher, .J. H. Wright, and A. J. Wright, hereinafter re-fered to as plaintiffs, filed their petition on the 27th day of March, 1930, in Mc-Curtain county, against the Choctaw Lumber Company of Delaware, a corporation, hereinafter designated as defendant, which petition, in substance, alleged that the defendant was indebted to them in the sum of $4,392.50, being the balance due upon a certain sale contract entered into between the parties. To which petition the defendant filed its answer, admitting such liability, but alleged that Paul A. Hartzell had some claim to said fund, and asked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Sosbee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nabob Oil Co. v. Bay State Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. National Outdoor Advertising Co. v. KalkhurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Nordman v. School District No. 43Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Crane-Rankin Development Co. v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. J. P. C. Petroleum Corp. v. Vulcan Steel Tank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API